People who have
fought for this country, those who has lived in this country their whole life
and the students, the future of our country, no longer have the edibility to
vote - is this fair? What message does this give our population?
In a video made by
Sarah Silverman, she describes the voter fraud in the US.
Here she mentions
that students who are important for the future of the US can't use their
student ID to vote but how gun owners can use their firearm permit.
Let's look back to
the 1960's when African-Americans in the South states were tested for the
edibility to vote. They had to pass an impossible test, the so-called literacy
test. The African-Americans weren't seen as real American citizen and eligible
to vote. Therefore, the test was made to be failed to prevent them from having
a political influence.
Last year
(November 2014) Harvard Students was given the same literacy test from the 1964
as the African-Americans were given. Not a single one of them passed. The test
questions had to be done within 10 minutes. Questions both vaguely-worded and
didn't define their edibility to vote.
We can all agree
that the literacy test was disenfranchisement and a fake science. Can’t we all
agree that the current voter issue is the same now?
Written by Sophie,
Linnea, Marie, Olga & Helene
Kongruensfejl - ''those who has lived'' those er i flertal, så der skal stå 'have' i stedet for 'has' :)
SvarSlet'citizen' i linje 3 af 3. afsnit, skal være i flertal (citizens).
SvarSletGod artikel! Formelt sprog men stadig nemt at forstå.
SvarSletLige 2 ting:
- Edibility = spiselighed. Tror i mener ability?
- "that the current voter issue is the same now" svarer lidt til at sige nuværende problem nu. Ville enten slette current eller now.